Oly C3030 and it's certainly not made to handle the 10d. That Canon Timer Remote Controller TC-80N3.īTW right now I have a super cheapo tripod I used to use with my On my wish list and once I have the tripod I will absolutely want The others you mention would really blow my budget. I think B&H has the 700DX legs for about $90, and the combo with pan head for about $130. It's easily able to handle the 10D and any lens you'd want to hang on it, and the stock pan head is about as good as you'll find for anywhere near the price. If there's anything under $150 that can handlethe weight of the 10D and that lens, plus the 420ex flash but is still lightweight, I'd like to know.Ĭheck out the Slik 700DX. So, I know the hassle of not being able to keep the camera in position. I've still got too much stuff on my wish list and once I have the tripod I will absolutely want that Canon Timer Remote Controller TC-80N3.īTW right now I have a super cheapo tripod I used to use with my Oly C3030 and it's certainly not made to handle the 10d - particularly with taht 75-300 weighing down the front end. I've really got to stay under $150 with this thing. I haven't checked the specs between it and the Bogen, but I doubt it is enough lighter to make it worth using. In addition, it is not very light either. Legs are much easier to adjust than the Slik. I just recently got the Bogenģ221 WN and the 488RC2 ball head and love this combo. Move as you tighten it and it will move under heavier loads. I am with the others on recommending against the U212. But then, if you want a really sturdy tripod that you can easily carry all day, carbon fiber works, but is quite expensive.Īt any rate, I would emphatically suggest the 300DX over the U212. Note that neither of these tripods is particularly light. The leg angle adjustment mechanisms are very fiddly, and don't hold very well. The head moves as you tighten it down, and it doesn't stay in place very well. While I often reccomend the 300DX as a good starter tripod, I could not, in good faith, reccomend the U212 Deluxe to anyone for any purpose. I also need to stay as light as possible since I will beĬarrying it everywhere on my already hefty backpack. What do you recommend in a comparable price range. Which is actually better, why, and if you don't care for these, The deluxe is $99Īnd the 300 is $119, but the deluxe "reads" better than the 300. ![]() Yet as they were out of stock and just came in. The head also includes a bubble level for accurate vertical positioning.Would you recommend either of these? I haven't seen them in person A geared center column makes fine height adjustments easy.Ī threaded mounting post on one leg lets you bring the camera down to just 8 inches (200 mm) from the ground for low angle photos, macro photography in the field, or copy work. ![]() The head has a lens calibrated panorama guide to make 360 &Mac176 panoramas from multiple pictures. The quick release camera post is smaller than most quick release plates and can be left on the camera almost all the time, so the camera is always ready to be mounted on the U-212 DX's ultra-smooth 3-way pan-head. The U212 deluxe was one of the first tripods to feature speed release leg locks on three-section "NON-TWIST" squared legs that will not turn and have retractable rubber leg tips and spikes for sure footing on any surface. ![]() Designed primarily for light weight 35mm SLR cameras or compact film and digital cameras, it features a number of exciting design concepts that were born with the original U 212 and have been copied into other tripods world-wide. The award winning U 212 DX is world-renowned designing that has carefully evolved for more than 20 years. It's not really the thing you would want to lug along on a two or three day wilderness trek.All in all I like this tripod. There is a little loss of stability at full height due to a slight column wiggle but at high shutter speeds it's not noticeable.The one complaint I do have is the weight of the tripod. As I am quite tall, I like the full extension height of the column. had the tripod operational again in less than 30 minutes. The longest lens I have used on it has been a 500mm and the tripod performed beautifully even with Semi-trucks going past at 65 mph less than 15 feet away.(I was feeling the effects of their going by) I have experienced the clamp cracking problem myself and was able to purchase a replacement clamp from Slik Co. For me it has been a solid, stable platform for night shots, Macro work, floral and Landscape photography. I have had my U-212 for 16 years now and Have no major complaints.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |